Paulo S. Especialidade: Design gráfico Número de funcionários: Profissional autônomo
No geral é muito boa pois não preciso acessar vários sites, já que o próprio já centraliza a busca.
O site centraliza vagas de emprego de diversos outros sites, tornando a busca mais facil.
Poderia ter mais filtros para as vagas, as vezes você coloca uma cidade e aparecem vagas de outras cidades.
Thiago A. Especialidade: Publicidade e marketing Número de funcionários: 1001-5000 funcionários
Plataforma muito boa, muitas vagas, sempre enviando lembretes das vagas, muito bom serviço.
Eu gostei que tem bastante anúncio de vagas na plataforma e que depois que você preenche o formulário de cadastro recebe continuamente e-mails com atualização de vagas.
Os filtros não são tão precisos, algumas vezes recebi indicação para vagas que não tinha interesse.
Jeff I. Especialidade: Alimentação e bebidas Número de funcionários: 2-10 funcionários
Indeed has been amazing at saving me time in sorting through potential candidates and the functionality has allowed me to be very specific in searching for candidate skill sets.
My experience has been that I’m able to find a deep and varied talent pool from which to seek candidates. I suspect some of this is due to the name recognition and broad use.
Although not my own experience, I’ve heard other users complain that the free version has limited access to details.
Tiffany A. Especialidade: Emprego e contratação Número de funcionários: 201-500 funcionários
Overall, now that I have a solid foundation and recruiting process, I really like the candidate diversity it has provided.
Indeed is so different from any of the other big job boards out there in terms of candidate pool and sourcing experience, though the job posting / application review is pretty standard. Indeed used to offer a pay-per-view of contact information for $1 per view. However, they have moved to a subscription based system, which might be more challenging for individual recruiters, but as an agency recruiter I prefer it. The dashboard is not fancy or bright, it is bare and basic, which makes it more user friendly and readable for seasoned recruiters.
The basic nature of the dashboard is potential a con as well. New recruiters who rely on call-to-action buttons and ATS integration for candidate management might struggle at first, to my knowledge Indeed is not integrated into any of the ATS I've used, so remembering to search for a pre-existing candidate record and manual resume parsing is required. Indeed also provides an "@indeedmail" email address for every candidate, and tends to populate it's Indeed formatted resume over the candidate's original, so often times their direct email is not provided.
Avaliador Verificado Especialidade: Hospitais e Saúde Número de funcionários: 201-500 funcionários
In general, the free version is useful and should be an automatic posting option for any Recruiting/Talent Acquisition department if it isn't already cross-posted by your ATS automatically. In a free version, you can excuse how bad the software is, which is pretty bad. However, their freemium aggregate model of scraping jobs from thousands of other sites and making their website a one-stop shop for job searchers made them the #1 job posting site quickly. But the dirty little secret is that this model isn't sustainable, and like Monster and Amazon, their first goal was to grow their user base, and then try to force paid versions onto their user base. However, unlike Monster, their product is only good because it was unique and free. There are tons of other sites that now use the aggregate scraping model and are much better programs. In addition, Google-for-Jobs has pretty much made Indeed obsolete by offering the same ability, but using the vast superior searchability of Google with an already existing Millennial user-base. The software is better, and it already syncs with google search. Regarding the paid version of Indeed, it just isn't worth it unless you recruit in large cities, you may need to use the paid version in order to not be buried quickly in their ads, but even then, the effectiveness is debatable when you can update the ad or repost it every few days. Even in larger cities, I haven't seen any quantifiable benefit of using the paid version.
As an aggregate job posting site, it is a must have for any recruiting department to use on a daily basis.
The free hosting feature is automatically done on most ATS programs.
Because they scrape from so many websites, job postings with them will reach even tough markets like Physicians, whereas Careerbuilder, Zip, Monster, etc. do NOT reach these.
Google-for-Jobs has made Indeed all but obsolete.
Their "paid" version is pointless compared to the free version. We have tested several times and have seen hardly any, if any, quantifiable difference for the huge cost, regardless of what the sales team says.
Their resume database is horrible in search function and results, although, useful in that you can pay per resume pull.
They are aesthetically the Craigslist of job search websites. The site is ugly (relative), hard to become a power user on (like Linkedin), and is only successful because of their Freemium aggregate model.